What is the difference between multi-acquiring and payment orchestration?
Multi-acquiring is the strategy: several acquiring contracts and the rules to route between them. Payment orchestration is the software layer that executes routing, retries and reconciliation across acquirers, PSPs and payment methods. Orchestration without the contracts behind it routes nothing.
In detail
Multi-acquiring is the strategy: several acquiring contracts and the rules to route between them. Payment orchestration is the software layer that executes routing, retries and reconciliation across acquirers, PSPs and payment methods. Orchestration without the contracts behind it routes nothing.
What multi-acquiring covers
A multi-acquirer setup keeps several acquiring contracts live, each with its own merchant IDs (MIDs), and decides per transaction where to send it. Merchants and platforms do it for local acquiring, which turns foreign traffic into domestic traffic, for approval rates, for resilience when one acquirer has an outage, and for pricing leverage. In the ACI Worldwide and Edgar, Dunn survey, 57% of merchants and 70% of PSPs worked with multiple acquirers.
Where payment orchestration fits
Routing between acquirers is the core of what payment orchestration does, with one difference: orchestration can route between PSPs and payment methods as well as acquirers. Routing software does not replace the acquiring contracts, the licenses and the banking strategy behind them. A platform that adds acquirers also needs the merchant file, the settlement matching and the per-acquirer monitoring to go with them.
More detail in our #PayDecoding episode on Multi-acquiring.