Is it cheaper to refund than to fight a chargeback?

Short answer

Often, for small orders. A chargeback costs merchants $128 on average in fees and internal costs, merchants win about 17% of the disputes they fight, and a won dispute still counts in the monitoring ratios. Fighting pays off mainly on high-value orders with strong evidence.

In detail

Often, for small orders. A chargeback costs merchants $128 on average in fees and internal costs, merchants win about 17% of the disputes they fight, and a won dispute still counts in the monitoring ratios. Fighting pays off mainly on high-value orders with strong evidence.

The cost of fighting

Merchants pay an average of $128 per chargeback in third-party fees and internal costs, according to Javelin research cited by Mastercard, often more than the value of the item. They win only 16.7% of the disputes they fight on average, according to the Merchant Risk Council.

The record stays

A dispute counts in Visa’s and Mastercard’s monitoring ratios as soon as it is filed. Winning it later recovers the money, not the ratio.

When each option makes sense

  • Refund through an alert for small orders, unrecognized charges and claims with weak evidence.
  • Fight for high-value orders with strong proof: delivery confirmation, authentication results, prior undisputed purchases.

What it means for payment operators

Merchants make this choice faster when alerts, refunds and evidence sit on the same transaction record. RDR rules can apply the refund decision automatically for the small cases, and leave people free for the disputes worth fighting.

Still have a question?

Our team walks you through the platform with your use case on the table.

Book a demo